{"id":7055,"date":"2020-08-29T10:03:10","date_gmt":"2020-08-29T10:03:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/?p=7055"},"modified":"2022-07-12T14:14:12","modified_gmt":"2022-07-12T14:14:12","slug":"responsible-management-and-ceos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/ar\/responsible-management-and-ceos\/","title":{"rendered":"Responsible Management and CEOs"},"content":{"rendered":"
As of 13 August 2020, COVID-19 has affected more than million people globally, including 744,385 deaths<\/span><\/a>, reported to\u00a0<\/span>WHO<\/span><\/a>. The virus has also had severe economic implications, leaving organizations facing a unique set of new challenges that can only be summed up in one word: uncertainty. And the only way to navigate these uncertain times is through leadership. <\/span>This is critical right now, as COVID-19 has magnified societal vulnerabilities. Good leaders can and should lead society into a new \u201cnormal\u201d. However when Harvard economist\u00a0<\/span>Greg Mankiw argued in a New York Times opinion piece<\/span><\/a>\u00a0that\u00a0<\/span>CEOs are qualified to make profits, not lead society<\/span><\/a>\u00a0this is somewhat inadequate to the times we live in now.\u00a0<\/span>Furthermore,\u00a0Doug Sundheim<\/a>, contributor at Forbes,\u00a0has argued in his article\u00a0“CEOs Have A Responsibility To Help Lead Society”<\/span><\/em><\/a>\u00a0that Greg’sc arguments just simply do not fit today\u2019s business models. This “shareholder-first business model” originated from 1970, however 50 years on a lot has changed and at a time when over\u00a0<\/span>70% of the largest entities on earth are corporations<\/span><\/a>, not nations, Mankiw\u2019s view is troubling.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The sheer number of corporations around the world should make us understand that business impacts societies on a global scale; therefore, business leaders have the responsibility to at least consider those societies and how they impact them.\u00a0<\/span>The singular management goal of CEOs is no longer about maximizing returns to shareholders, but to support society as business has grown more interconnected and complex. Today, business and society are weaved together in an intricate way, both depending on the other for stability and success.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The COVID-19 pandemic has also changed businesses and created a surge in the number of positive collaborations between companies, institutions and governments. Our article\u00a0<\/span>\u201cCOVID-19 prompted innovative leadership<\/span><\/a>\u201d reflects how Mankiw fails to grasp the world in which CEOs are now in fact leading communities and helping societies.<\/span><\/p>\n Mankiw asks the reader to imagine having to make an executive decision and how effective and simplier it is when your only priority is profits, and not the wider set of stakeholders \u2013 i.e., employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders. Mankiw defends the idea that c<\/span>orporate management\u2019s mandate should be the narrow self-interest of achieving greater profits for shareholders, not broad social welfare.\u00a0<\/span><\/em>He goes on to list several additional hypothetical questions. A social-driven leader would have to consider:<\/span><\/p>\n However, the above questions are now part of the many new demands from consumers, talent and governments.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Consumers have changed; they are no longer only interested in the end product. Consumers are demanding more from companies for their buy-in. And every corporate leader has to include some version of the above questions in their considerations if they want to succeed.\u00a0<\/span>Top CEOs say social responsibility should be prioritised over profits<\/span><\/a>\u00a0proving that social responsibility planning; it\u2019s officially basic business planning. Last year the\u00a0<\/span>bosses of 181 Leading US\u2019s biggest companies dropped the shareholder-first principle<\/span><\/a>\u00a0\u2013 they\u00a0<\/span>changed the official definition of \u201cthe purpose of a corporation\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0(from making the most money possible for shareholders) to \u201cimproving our society.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Most successful CEOs and corporate leaders have profit in mind, and they always will; but they are also considering the needs of a variety of stakeholders, including the communities they impact. In this day and age, CEOs and corporate leaders are rising up to social expectations and are balancing the demands of multiple stakeholders.<\/span><\/p>\n Mankiw questioned CEOs\u2019 and corporate leaders\u2019 ability to be broadly competent social planners.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/em>Paul Polman (former Unilever CEO) talks about creating\u00a0<\/span>collective courage<\/span><\/a>. He rightly argues that it\u2019s difficult for one industry player to impact an issue like reducing greenhouse gases because of the loss of competitiveness. However, if 20% of industry players come together, they can begin tipping the scales.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>It\u2019s starting to happen. In this way, by unifying their efforts, corporations, governmental agencies, and NGOs can partner to lead society.<\/span><\/p>\n CEOs and other leaders now find themselves in a changed world … they can and should play a variety of leadership roles that move beyond narrow profit maximization. This is a social responsibility, not broad social planning. Short-term earnings no longer feature in the top of the mission statement for most successful companies. We\u2019re starting to\u00a0<\/span>find our way back<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to a more balanced view, and we need CEOs\u2019 leadership in the process.<\/span><\/p>\n Mankiw admits that the world needs people to look out for the broad well-being of society<\/span><\/em>\u00a0\u2013<\/span>\u00a0elected leaders who are competent and trustworthy \u2013 but those people are not CEOs.\u00a0<\/span><\/em>However, Mankiw fails to acknowledge just how much influence CEOs and corporate leaders have over our elected officials and the legislative process. Today, large corporations and their associations\u00a0<\/span>outspend labour and public interest groups 34 to 1 on lobbying efforts<\/span><\/a>\u00a0in the US.<\/span><\/p>\n In today\u2019s high-risk environment, businesses have to pay attention to their social and environmental roles not only due to demand, but out of responsibility for the damage they (can) cause. For example, companies that contribute to, but then deny, climate change \u2013 the attorneys general of several American states launched investigations into\u00a0<\/span>ExxonMobil and\u00a0<\/span><\/a>whether they\u00a0<\/span>had committed fraud by sowing doubts about climate change – even as its own scientists knew it was taking place<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to\u00a0<\/span>firms involved in botched Grenfell Tower revamp refusing to accept responsibility for tragedy<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/u>\u00a0Then there is Chamath Palihapitiya,\u00a0<\/span>former Facebook executive, who expressed regret for his part in building tools that destroy \u2018the social fabric of how society works\u2019<\/span><\/a>. Companies are responsible for causing great damage on a human scale. We have to hold companies, CEOs and brands accountable for their destructive impact in today\u2019s society; while they have a responsibility to support and help lead society.<\/span><\/p>\n CEOs and corporate leaders are exerting immense influence behind the scenes; therefore, qualified CEOs and corporate leaders should step up and help lead on the thorny economic issues of the day. However, with great power comes great social responsibility. Not all of the corporate leaders are equipped to lead societies; therefore, they should take a significant weight off the scale. Contrary to what Mankiw and others of his mindset might think, we must continue to demand more from our corporations, their boards, and their CEOs and leaders. Corporate leaders can make a unique and lasting\u00a0<\/span>positive impact,\u00a0<\/span><\/em>too.<\/span><\/p>\n About us…<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Based in London, CRI\u00ae Group works with companies across the Americas, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific as a one-stop international <\/span>Risk Management<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0<\/span>Employee Background Screening<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0<\/span> In 2016, CRI\u00ae Group launched\u00a0<\/span>the Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC\u00ae) Center of Excellence<\/span><\/a>\u00a0– an independent certification body established for\u00a0<\/span>ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0<\/span>ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems<\/span><\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<\/span>ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management<\/span><\/a>, providing\u00a0<\/span>training<\/span><\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<\/span>certification<\/span><\/a>. ABAC\u00ae operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. As a result, CRI\u00ae Group’s global team of certified fraud examiners work as a discreet white-labelled supplier to some of the world’s largest organizations. <\/span>Contact ABAC\u00ae for more<\/span><\/a>\u00a0on ISO Certification and training.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n MEET THE CEO<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Zafar I. Anjum is Group Chief Executive Officer of CRI\u00ae Group (www.crigroup.com), a global supplier of investigative, forensic accounting, business due to diligence and employee background screening services for some of the world’s leading business organizations. Headquartered in London (with a significant presence throughout the region) and licensed by the Dubai International Financial Centre-DIFC, the Qatar Financial Center – QFC, and the Abu Dhabi Global Market-ADGM, CRI\u00ae Group safeguard businesses by establishing the legal compliance, financial viability, and integrity levels of outside partners, suppliers and customers seeking to affiliate with your business. CRI\u00ae Group maintains offices in UAE, Pakistan, Qatar, Singapore, Malaysia, Brazil, China, the USA, and the United Kingdom.<\/span><\/p>\n Contact CRI\u00ae Group to learn more about its 3PRM-Certified\u2122 third-party risk management strategy program and discover an effective and proactive approach to mitigating the risks associated with corruption, bribery, financial crimes and other dangerous risks posed by third-party partnerships.<\/span><\/p>\n CONTACT INFORMATION<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Zafar Anjum, MSc, MS, CFE, CII, MICA, Int. Dip. (Fin. Crime) | CRI\u00ae Group Chief Executive Officer<\/span><\/p>\n 37th Floor, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AA United Kingdom<\/span><\/p>\n t: +44 207 8681415 | m: +44 7588 454959 | e: zanjum@crigroup.com<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As of 13 August 2020, COVID-19 has affected more than million people globally, including 744,385 deaths, reported to\u00a0WHO. The virus has also had severe economic implications, leaving organizations facing a unique set of new challenges that can only be summed up in one word: uncertainty. And the only way to navigate these uncertain times is […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7266,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,16,11,12,13,43,17,146,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-background-investigation","category-compliance-solution","category-covid-19","category-due-diligence","category-employee-background-check","category-investigative-solution","category-iso-37001","category-resources","category-third-party-risk-management"],"gutentor_comment":0,"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n