{"id":1658,"date":"2021-07-15T10:15:31","date_gmt":"2021-07-15T10:15:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/?post_type=blog&p=1658"},"modified":"2024-01-23T14:45:41","modified_gmt":"2024-01-23T14:45:41","slug":"background-checks-to-check-or-not-to-check","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/ar\/background-checks-to-check-or-not-to-check\/","title":{"rendered":"To Check or Not to Check?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Background checks don\u2019t tend to make international news. They are the low-key diligent step in most well-managed recruitment processes to comfort employers that the person they are hiring is everything they seem \u2013 and nothing more.<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s why the background checks of Belle Gibson, a super influencer<\/a> who lied about having cancer, and Brett Kavanaugh, a nominee to the US Supreme Court, tend to make news headlines for who can you trust if not those in direct line of the public eye?<\/span><\/p>\n Belle Gibson was a Melbourne \u201cwellness\u201d who rose to fame after sharing her story on Instagram of her terminal brain cancer and how she controls it through the power of healthy eating. Gibson claimed to have kept her cancer under control by turning away conventional medicinal practices and instead of following what she termed a \u201cwellness\u201d diet, a diet consisting of avocados, berries, no alcohol and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n Sounds impressive, right? To rid yourself of an incurable disease simply through eating better? Think again – it is too good to be true. The influencers lie caused untold damage<\/a>, including turning a 44-year-old mother away from her chemotherapy in hopes of attaining Ms Gibson’s lifestyle.<\/span><\/p>\nThe Story of Belle Gibson & Brett Kavanaugh<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n