{"id":1072,"date":"2020-05-15T21:34:56","date_gmt":"2020-05-15T21:34:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/?p=1072"},"modified":"2022-01-17T05:27:03","modified_gmt":"2022-01-17T05:27:03","slug":"professional-tprm-implementation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crigroup.com\/ar\/professional-tprm-implementation\/","title":{"rendered":"Wal-Mart: a professional TPRM implementation would have avoided this situation."},"content":{"rendered":"
Lack of TPRM strategy can be an expensive reminder of how important is it to balance the risks and benefits of using third parties to deliver business services.<\/span><\/p>\n On June 20, 2019,\u00a0<\/span>Walmart Inc global retail corporation, settled a long-running corruption investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)<\/span><\/a>\u00a0to resolve a long-running U.S. bribery investigation into allegations of bribery by its employees.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n According to the agreed-upon statement of facts in the DOJ settlement documents, as well as allegations in the SEC administrative order, from 2000 until 2011, despite the fact that certain Walmart personnel responsible for implementing and maintaining the Company’s internal accounting controls related to anti-corruption were aware of certain controls failures, including failures related to potentially improper payments to government officials by certain Walmart foreign subsidiaries, Walmart failed to implement appropriate internal controls to prevent such improper payments.<\/span><\/p>\n The DOJ alleged that Walmart failed to do the following:<\/span><\/p>\n\n