Can ISO 37001:2016 prevent bribery?

Since its launch in 2016, ISO 37001 Anti-Bribery Management Systems standard has had its supporters and critics. Some regulatory bodies and compliance communities initially expressed concern regarding the lack of a body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of ISO 37001:2016 from certain standpoints. Critics asserted that the new standard failed to address broad compliance concerns, and questioned whether ISO 37001:2016 certification alone can prevent prosecution. These observations should certainly be weighed and considered, as any new compliance standard must be properly evaluated on its merits. In the case of ISO 37001, however, the critics have made some misjudgments in regards to the key factors they feel are in question with the standard. Can ISO 37001:2016 prevent bribery?

One of the most important things to remember is that a standard like 37001 and all of its measures require a commitment and implementation by the organisation adopting them. ISO 37001 is a standard, administered by a certified body but ultimately implemented by employees of the organisation itself. The purpose of ISO 37001 standard is to provide a framework against which an organisation’s anti-bribery management can be assessed and certified, rather than a foolproof blueprint to prevent bribery.

The story behind ISO 37001:2016

First, some background: The International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, is the international standard-setting body composed of representatives from various national standards organisations. Founded on 23 Feb. 1947, ISO promotes worldwide proprietary, industrial, and commercial standards. Responding to an international need, ISO issued the 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management System standard to help businesses, nonprofits and governmental agencies reduce their risk of bribery and corruption by establishing, implementing, maintaining and improving an anti-bribery management system.

The ISO 37001 standard requirement, which references to ISO 19600 – Compliance Management System, specifies mandatory requirements for organisations when establishing/updating their anti-bribery management programs in a manner that is proportionate to the potential bribery risk. The reference to these requirements is referred to as “appropriate” and “reasonable”, hence directing organisations to undertake a subjective, diligent and rigorous review of current compliance framework, which will make ISO 37001 effective for them. According to Deloitte & Touche LLP, “[in ISO 37001:2016] it’s the substance, not the form, of a compliance program that determines its effectiveness”.

Anti-corruption versus broad compliance issues

Some of the concerns regarding the effectiveness of ISO 37001 are focused on whether it addresses broad compliance issues, like inequality, harassment, various types of fraud (outside of bribery and corruption), or similar offences. Seeing that it generally does not, as its focus is on anti-bribery and anti-corruption compliance, some take the view that ISO 37001 has adopted a simplistic approach. The scope of ISO 37001 addresses “establishing, implementing, maintaining, reviewing, and improving an anti-bribery management system,” whether as a stand-alone initiative or part of a broader anti-corruption. Therefore, implementing ISO 37001 standard requirements should be viewed as a way of enhancing, rather than replacing, an organisation’s existing anti-corruption compliance programs.

ISO 37001 is effective step-by-step guidance for those organisations which lack an anti-corruption framework and enables them to implement a compliance program without investing significant time in identifying the regulatory and non-regulatory requirements. In fact, ISO 37001 has incorporated Federal Sentencing Guidelines, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Ministry of Justice Bribery Act 2010 Guidance, and OECD’s Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics and Compliance. Former U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein highlighted three hallmarks of a policy-effective compliance program, which are concurrent with ISO 37001 requirements and include: fostering a culture of compliance; dedicating sufficient resources to compliance activities; and ensuring that experienced compliance personnel has appropriate access to the board.

Prosecution of offences

Lastly, there is a widely held belief that obtaining ISO 37001 certification is an effective tool to avoid prosecution for bribery. These misconceptions have not been viewed favourably insofar as to Ms. Hui Chen, U.S. DOJ’s former compliance counsel, stating “Dan Kahn, the Chief of the FCPA Unit in the Fraud Section of DOJ’s Criminal Division, has been very consistent: prosecutors will not outsource their responsibilities”. Rightly so. ISO 37001 certification does not act as insurance to corporate liability for bribery, neither does it refute the need to perform due diligence, and it should be considered and implemented as per company’s risk profile. In practicality, implementing ISO 37001 can demonstrate to enforcement agencies and regulators that the organisation has taken reasonable steps to establish a compliance program to mitigate bribery risks, however, ISO 37001 certification will mitigate the consequences, if not a shield, an organisation from investigation or prosecution.

ISO 37001:2016 embraced by organisations and governments

It is important to note that organisations and governments alike are embracing ISO 37001 as the standard for prevention and detection. One example of this is in Malaysia, where the ISO 37001 standard was adopted across the government under Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. The new system has been received positively in both the public and private sectors, and Malaysia’s former anti-graft chief said “the people’s perception on the government’s seriousness to fight corruption had increased to 70.8 per cent last year from 59.8 per cent in 2016. He said that Malaysia has also shown improvement in its performance indicators in several important international studies and indexes” (New Straits Times, 2019). True to form, various heads of government in the country are following the directive. Defence Minister Mohamed Sabu recently “cautioned his officers to adhere to the Anti-Bribery Management System, which had attained the International Standards Organisation’s ISO 37001: 2016 certification” (New Straits Times, 2019).

Malaysia is not alone. In Peru, Singapore, and China (Shenzhen Institute of Standards and Technology [SIST]), the national standard bodies have adopted and localised the ISO 37001 standard. In Italy, the ISO 37001 accreditation scheme has been developed by Accredia; whereas in the UK, United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) has undertaken an ISO 37001 pilot program to develop an accreditation scheme. In the United Arab Emirates, Emirates International Accreditation Centre (EIAC) is undertaking the ISO 37001 accreditation scheme development with CRI® Group’s ABAC® Center of Excellence. ABAC® is an initiative launched by CRI® Group and offers ISO 37001 certification services. Hence, amid these positive developments, the outlook for ISO 37001 looks promising. ISO 37001 is not a “silver bullet” to foolproof an organisation from bribery or corruption, or avoid prosecution should those offences occur. It was never designed to be. Instead, it is a framework to implement the necessary controls and systems at the organisation level – across all levels – so as to be better equipped to prevent bribery and corruption moving forward.

CRI® Group has experts who have conducted fraud investigations all around the world, for organisations of all sizes and industries. Our investigators work on-site at your company bringing a boots-on-the-ground approach to uncovering all the facts of the case. When you’ve uncovered fraud, that’s the time to let the experts take over. You owe it to yourself and the future of your business to make sure every investigation is done professionally and effectively. Contact CRI® to learn more about our fraud investigations today. Get a FREE QUOTE

About us…

Based in London, CRI® Group works with companies across the Americas, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific as a one-stop international Risk Management, Employee Background Screening, 

In 2016, CRI® Group launched the Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. As a result, CRI® Group’s global team of certified fraud examiners work as a discreet white-labelled supplier to some of the world’s largest organisations. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training.

MEET THE CEO

Zafar I. Anjum is Group Chief Executive Officer of CRI® Group (www.crigroup.com), a global supplier of investigative, forensic accounting, business due to diligence and employee background screening services for some of the world’s leading business organisations. Headquartered in London (with a significant presence throughout the region) and licensed by the Dubai International Financial Centre-DIFC, the Qatar Financial Center – QFC, and the Abu Dhabi Global Market-ADGM, CRI® Group safeguard businesses by establishing the legal compliance, financial viability, and integrity levels of outside partners, suppliers and customers seeking to affiliate with your business. CRI® Group maintains offices in UAE, Pakistan, Qatar, Singapore, Malaysia, Brazil, China, the USA, and the United Kingdom.

Contact CRI® Group to learn more about its 3PRM-Certified™ third-party risk management strategy program and discover an effective and proactive approach to mitigating the risks associated with corruption, bribery, financial crimes and other dangerous risks posed by third-party partnerships.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Zafar Anjum, MSc, MS, CFE, CII, MICA, Int. Dip. (Fin. Crime) | CRI® Group Chief Executive Officer

37th Floor, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AA United Kingdom

t: +44 207 8681415 | m: +44 7588 454959 | e: zanjum@crigroup.com

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Compliance Solution,

Anti-Bribery Compliance Programs in EMEA Countries

Preventing bribery and corruption is a global effort that crosses international borders…

Preventing bribery and corruption is a global effort that crosses international borders. In just the past few years, many governments have enacted more laws and regulations to reflect that reality. European, Middle Eastern and African (EMEA) countries are no exception – in many ways, they are at the forefront of this new anti-bribery and anti-corruption landscape and compliance program development. This critical shift from bygone years of sweeping unethical business behaviour under the rug to creating strict enforcement measures is well overdue. The sometimes overlapping nature of these laws and varying rules based upon their jurisdictions can pose challenges to compliance officers, however. Not to mention that the “letter of the law” sometimes lends to different interpretations depending on the local politics of the day.

When organisations do uncover wrongdoing, their leadership must be careful to understand that the wrong approach to investigation might get them into trouble: employee privacy protections are higher in some European nations, for example, potentially affecting a company’s ability to monitor employee behaviour and investigate wrongdoing.

The article will discuss some of the new laws and regulations that have been enacted (or are still emerging) in various EMEA countries, and provide a perspective on managing compliance standards across varying jurisdictions. The new wave of anti-bribery and anti-corruption controls is a good thing for the economy and for protecting investments worldwide. Business leaders must just be sure not to get caught by the tide.

Europe: Leading the Charge

In most European countries today, it can be very costly to be caught breaking bribery laws. Most laws call for stiff fines. The UK largely ushered in this landscape with the introduction of the UK Bribery Act 2010. Under this groundbreaking law, individuals or businesses may face up to 10 years in prison or unlimited fines. “The UK Bribery Act imposes more severe penalties and is broader in scope than the FCPA, covering bribes to private parties as well to foreign officials. The UK Bribery Act also prohibits being bribed, not just giving bribes. Because of the close ties between the United States and the United Kingdom, US businesses should pay special attention to all forms of potential bribery abroad, regardless of jurisdictional technicalities.” (Everfi, 2020).

Click here to read the full article.

Other Anti-Bribery and Compliance resources from our independent certification body ABAC®:

• Prove that your business is ethical. Complete our FREE Highest Ethical Business Assessment (HEBA) and evaluate your current Corporate Compliance Program. Find out if your organization’s compliance program is in the line with worldwide Compliance, Business Ethics, Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Frameworks.
• Bribery and corruption plague Middle East, how can ISO 37001 help? Read more here or download the free e-book now to know more about ABAC solutions in the Middle East.
• Are you ready for ISO 37001? Download our free e-book: The latest global anti-bribery standards redefine a framework for corporate compliance, and find out more!

Let’s Talk!

If you have any further questions or interest in implementing compliance solutions, please contact us.

Don’t leave hiring to chance. Take a proactive stance with the highest level of background screening as a part of your essential corporate strategy. Contact us today to learn more about our full range of services to help your organization stay protected.

Get a FREE QUOTE

About us…

Based in London, CRI® Group works with companies across the Americas, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific as a one-stop international Risk Management, Employee Background Screening, 

In 2016, CRI® Group launched the Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. As a result, CRI® Group’s global team of certified fraud examiners work as a discreet white-labelled supplier to some of the world’s largest organizations. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training.

MEET THE CEO

Zafar I. Anjum is Group Chief Executive Officer of CRI® Group (www.crigroup.com), a global supplier of investigative, forensic accounting, business due to diligence and employee background screening services for some of the world’s leading business organizations. Headquartered in London (with a significant presence throughout the region) and licensed by the Dubai International Financial Centre-DIFC, the Qatar Financial Center – QFC, and the Abu Dhabi Global Market-ADGM, CRI® Group safeguard businesses by establishing the legal compliance, financial viability, and integrity levels of outside partners, suppliers and customers seeking to affiliate with your business. CRI® Group maintains offices in UAE, Pakistan, Qatar, Singapore, Malaysia, Brazil, China, the USA, and the United Kingdom.

Contact CRI® Group to learn more about its 3PRM-Certified™ third-party risk management strategy program and discover an effective and proactive approach to mitigating the risks associated with corruption, bribery, financial crimes and other dangerous risks posed by third-party partnerships.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Zafar Anjum, MSc, MS, CFE, CII, MICA, Int. Dip. (Fin. Crime) | CRI® Group Chief Executive Officer

37th Floor, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5AA United Kingdom

t: +44 207 8681415 | m: +44 7588 454959 | e: zanjum@crigroup.com

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Compliance Solution, ISO 37001, Resources by admin
No Comments »

MACCA’s Corporate Liability Provisions are in place

Malaysia is taking a further step against corruption with its new Corporate Liability Provisions of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (Amendment) Act 2018. The new provisions go into force this June. The measure has been compared to the UK Bribery Act 2010 and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) 1977 (The Star, 2019). Section 17A of the MACC Act 2018 will enable the prosecution of individuals accused of corruption, not only organisations. Under the provisions, an organisation’s “directors, controllers, officers, partners, or managers are deemed to have committed the same offence, which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of not less than 10 times the value of the gratification or RM1 million, whichever is higher, and 20 years’ jail unless the firm is able to prove that it had in place procedures designed to prevent corrupt practices. The provision is modelled after the United Kingdom’s Section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010, which is widely regarded as ‘the toughest anti-corruption legislation in the world’” (New Straits Times, 2019). Perhaps it’s no coincidence that Malaysia improved by six points and jumped 10 places to 51 in Transparency International’s 2019 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The CPI “measures public sector corruption including bribery, diversion of public funds, use of public office for private gain, and nepotism in the civil service” (Free Malaysia Today, 2020).

The change in law and perception meets popular demand in Malaysia, where the 1MDB case became the defining bribery scandal in the region. Malaysia’s state-owned investment fund, 1MDB, was supposed to attract foreign investment. Instead, it “spurred criminal and regulatory investigations around the world that have cast an unflattering spotlight on financial deal-making, election spending and political patronage under former Prime Minister Najib Razak. The figures are mind-boggling: a Malaysian parliamentary committee identified at least $4.2 billion in irregular transactions related to 1MDB. In May, Najib was ousted from power in a general election as the scandal fueled a voter backlash that ended his party’s 61 years of rule. As the investigations continue, Najib faces trial on corruption charges and U.S. prosecutors have implicated at least three senior Goldman Sachs Group Inc. bankers in a multiyear criminal enterprise” (Bloomberg, 2018).

The 1MDB scandal also demonstrated, however, that investigation and enforcement were stepping up in the face of public outrage. The MACC Act 2018 provided regulators with more teeth in the fight against corruption in the country. At ABAC Summit – Kuala Lumpur, organised by CRI Group, Mohd Nur Lokman bin Samingan, Assistant Commissioner at Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, said that some of the MACC Act’s provisions are meant “to encourage business and commercial activities being carried out in a corruption-free environment; to encourage all commercial organisations to take adequate measures in order to prevent corruption in their respective organisations; and to promote better corporate governance and legal compliance by requiring corporations to take proactive roles in preventing corruption.”

Demonstrating “adequate procedures” with ISO 37001 certification

Now more than ever it is critical that organisations undergo a program of compliance and demonstrate “adequate procedures” with ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management standard certification. ISO 37001 is an established, tried and tested program that provides a comprehensive program for preventing bribery and corruption. It can be tailored to organisations of all sizes and industries, and certification requires the demonstration that processes have been implemented effectively – with follow-up evaluations. The new corporate liability provisions to the MACC Act are an important thing for safeguarding Malaysia’s economy and investments.

It is crucial to trust your anti-bribery and compliance strategies to accredited ISO 37001 certification providers. CRI Group’s ABAC® has recently announced that the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) has accredited its ABAC Certification services for administering the ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems standard. ABAC® provides ISO 37001:2016 anti-bribery management systems certification for all types of organisations across the globe that implement prescribed measures to prevent, detect and address bribery. Pursuant to this, UKAS accredited ABAC Center of Excellence Limited in the UK, Malaysia and UAE for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems (ABMS) certification in accordance with ISO/IEC 17021-1: 2015 conformity assessment requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems.

Trust ABAC®, your accredited certification provider in Malaysia to comply with requirements of Section 17A of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act (MACCA 2018) with confidence. To learn more about how the ABAC Center of Excellence can help tailor an ISO 37001 certification program to your organisation, contact ABAC Center of Excellence Limited today.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][accordion_father][accordion_son title=”About CRI Group”]Based in London, CRI Group works with companies across the Americas, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific as a one-stop international Risk Management, Employee Background Screening,

In 2016, CRI Group launched Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. As a result, CRI Group’s global team of certified fraud examiners work as a discreet white-labelled supplier to some of the world’s largest organisations. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training.[/accordion_son][/accordion_father][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Compliance Solution, ISO 37001, Resources by admin
No Comments »

Create a zero-tolerance approach to fraud with ISO 37001 ABMS

Zero tolerance to fraud, how ISO 37001 ABMS can help?

Smart business leaders know that “Tone at the Top” is a critical factor in an organisation’s culture. The behaviour and attitudes exhibited by those at the top of the chainset an example for the rest of the staff to follow. This couldn’t be more true when it comes to ethical standards. If a company is lax and tolerant toward unethical behaviour, it creates a confusing message for employees and actually encourages damaging habits.

When a company creates a zero-tolerance environment for fraud and corruption, the opposite is true: employees understand that ethical behaviour is the norm. Anything outside of those bounds will be punished – perhaps with the loss of their job or even prosecution.

Creating a zero-tolerance approach to fraud doesn’t happen overnight. When your organisation enrols in ISO 37001 ABMS training and certification, the program involves your entire team.

The training helps establish an ethical culture by educating your employees on the following:

• What constitutes fraud, corruption, and bribery, and why these are so damaging to business
• How to identify red flags of fraud, corruption and bribery
• The process for reporting fraudulent and unethical acts
• The organisation’s zero-tolerance attitude toward unethical behaviour and willingness to terminate employees for breaches and prosecute unethical acts
• The serious ramifications for committing fraud or bribery, the legal consequences, and the negative impact on one’s career

Employees shouldn’t be expected to follow a code of conduct that they aren’t aware exists. That’s why ISO 37001 ABMS creates a communication plan through which organisation leaders regularly communicate their ethical behaviour expectations to staff.

The anti-fraud and anti-corruption controls established by ISO 37001 ABMS also apply to personnel at all levels of the organisation. When employees see that higher-level executives are subject to the same ethical standards as the individual at the lowest level of the flow chart, they understand that the organisation is serious about its commitment to having an ethical workplace free of fraud, corruption and bribery. That’s Tone at the Top.

Filed under: All Industries, Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Global, Industry Insights, ISO 37001, Resources by admin
No Comments »

Due Diligence: 4 Red Flags of Collusion

One of the many schemes that can cause serious legal and financial consequences is collusion in business. While some business leaders might wonder what separates collusion from other types of fraud and how to identify it, there is a key factor: secrecy. 

Collusion involves at least two parties (sometimes more) who collaborate to deceive others, usually for financial or market gain. Due to its secretive nature, collusion can be difficult to detect and weed out. This poses a serious problem because the consequences of noncompliance for an organisation are often severe.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is “preparing to tackle competition issues in several important markets, including alleged price-fixing in the generic-drug industry, rules for music licensing and purported employer collusion that limits options for sought-after workers” (Wall Street Journal, 2020). Indeed, these are the types of schemes that are most often associated with collusion. Price fixing is a global problem found in many different industries, for example. However it’s important to note that collusion is just as common at the local level – for example, where contractors bid to provide goods or services regularly. Sometimes competitors will engage in collusion by making secret arrangements to rotate bids or share bid details to artificially deflate prices.

In one recent case, the branch manager for a U.S.-based insulation contractor pleaded guilty in a scheme to rig bids and commit other forms of fraud on insulation contracts. The DOJ had launched an investigation into the branch manager’s actions from 2011 to 2018, finding that he “conspired with other insulation installation contractors to rig bids and engage in fraud on insulation installation contracts in Connecticut, New York, and Massachusetts. Insulation installation contractors install insulation around pipes and ducts on renovation and new construction projects at universities, hospitals, and other public and private entities. In addition to his guilty plea, DeVoe has agreed to pay restitution” (DOJ, 2020). “Free and open markets are the foundation of a vibrant economy. For years, the defendant illegally coordinated bids on construction projects to enhance his profits, eliminate competition, and ultimately steal from public and private customers,” said Brian C. Turner, Special Agent in Charge of FBI’s New Haven Field Office.

The DOJ noted in its press release that this crime hurt the hospitals, universities and businesses that solicit and pay for the contractor’s services under the expectation that the bidding process is fair and above board, not rigged to benefit a contractor at their expense. The money lost in such schemes (through paying inflated contracts) often represents taxpayer dollars. The fact that collusion, in this case, lasted for at least seven years indicates that tens of thousands of dollars (or more) were likely lost through fraud.

So, what can organisations do to be better protected from collusion schemes – whether from inside their own company or perpetrated against them by outside partners/contractors? While collusion is secretive by its very nature and can be difficult to detect, red flags can indicate that something might be amiss. CRI® Group’s integrity due diligence experts are specially trained to uncover collusion in all its forms, and they describe the following as some of the signs to watch for when dealing with competitive bid contracts:

A high percentage of awards go to the same company

If a single bidder is winning most of the contracts for a particular set of goods or services, there might be something wrong despite several other contractors involved in the bidding. This is especially true if there are any issues or complaints around the bidder, such as poor quality products or services, they are late in delivering on their contracts, etc.

Lowest bidders are not winning awards

Suppose the contracts are consistently going to bidders other than the lowest bidder. In that case, this might warrant further investigation – as most contracts are considered “low bid” and would reasonably go to the lowest bidder. Also, if there is a higher-than-average range or spread between bidders, that could signal that something is off.

There is a high number of late bidders

Late bids can be a sign of collusion if bidders, or an agent at the organisation soliciting bids, are sharing bid information – such as the highest bid (so far) in an award process. This is especially true when the winning bidder is consistently the last one to submit bids. If late bidders are being approved regularly, you need to know why.

Bidders share (or have similar) names, addresses, or other information

This is an obvious red flag. In some cases, bids from two different contractors have been submitted from the same fax machine! This indicates that parties might be colluding in their bid submissions, and you need to look further.

Other countries’ DOJ and enforcement bodies have demonstrated their willingness to detect, investigate, and punish collusion. For the sake of your organisation, it is best to be proactive when it comes to your bidding and contract processes. CRI® Group’s integrity due diligence services can help you identify the above red flags. Our experts also conduct risk assessments to help find weaknesses in your business process and controls that might make your organisation vulnerable to collusion. This holds whether you need the goods or services or are a supplier or contractor submitting bids. The secret crime of collusion causes financial harm through inflated costs, representing a legal and financial liability to your organisation and/or clients. By being attuned to spot red flags, you’ll be more likely to notice the smoke …. before it turns into a fire.

Download our Brochure

Take a proactive stance with the highest integrity due diligence as a part of your essential business strategy. Contact us today to learn more about our full range of services to help your organisation stay protected. Get a FREE QUOTE

About Us

CRI® Group has safeguarded businesses from any risks, providing investigations (i.e. insurance fraud), employee background screening, investigative due diligence, business intelligence,  third-party risk management, forensic accounting, compliance and other professional investigative research services. In 2016, CRI® Group launched the Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training.

Filed under: Compliance Solution,

Senior Management need to take responsibility for managing financial crime risk now!

Corporate fraud is only one form of transnational financial crimes and money laundering is a prominent form which involves the false legitimisation of illegal funds (Unger & Van Der Linde, 2013, p. 22). Increasing attention has been given to this form of financial crime, particularly on an international level, which has provoked the creation of laws across the globe designed to detect, punish and prevent it (Otusanya, 2009). Globalisation has rendered it all the more easy for finances to be transferred between countries, hence the international status of money laundering (Beekarry, 2013). This type of transnational financial crime poses a particular threat to the economic and political wellbeing of states and national governments (Rusmin & Alistair, 2007). This has led to reforms in anti-money laundering regulations across the globe, as it has been recognised that such activity must be more aggressively monitored, prevented and punished (Ridley & Dean, 2012). This strongly indicates that a prominent motivational factor in the perpetration of transnational financial crimes is a lack of effective regulation, monitoring and awareness of those who engage in such conduct.

With little fear of detection, and in the absence of suitable mechanisms, individuals are not deterred from committing such crimes, particularly due to the huge financial and other benefits that they reap as a result of such activity. Bribery and corruption are commonplace in the modern world, due to major developments in the methods by which business transactions may be conducted.

The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention 1999 (Article 1) defines bribery as the offer, promise or giving of ‘any undue pecuniary or other advantage…to a foreign official…in order that the official act or refrain from acting in relation to the performance of official duties in order to obtain or retain business or other improper advantage’. Corruption is defined as the ‘abuse of entrusted power for personal gain’ (Transparency International UK, 2011, p. 3). While these definitions are contained in several conventions, there is interestingly no internationally accepted definition of bribery and corruption (Shacklock & Galtung, 2016). This is problematic because it results in inconsistent interpretation of these crimes in various legal systems. It also reveals a further important issue – that the development, impact and application of international law can be hindered by a lack of consensus on the definition of crimes, and also other matters, such as the degree of fault required to establish liability. As will be explored in greater detail in the following chapters, this supports the claim that a motivational cause of the perpetration of transnational financial crimes may be the lack of an international consensus on how they should be regulated, defined and implemented. The existence of international legislative frameworks, moreover, does not ensure that national laws will follow suit, or adopt a consistent approach globally (Dixon, 2013). This indicates the discrepancy that often exists between international and national law, which could be defined as a further motivational cause of the perpetration of transnational financial crimes. Although an international law may exist, if it is not incorporated effectively (or at all) into national law, then its impact and purpose is undermined. In the context of corruption, the occurrence of such crimes in the UK has been attributed to the failure of the UK to adequately incorporate international anti- corruption regulations into UK national law (Persson et al, 2013). This is perplexing because research shows that UK companies have a long-standing tradition of bribery for the purpose of winning public contracts and superseding national laws that they consider to be a hindrance to their success (Carr & Outhwaite, 2009).

This brief overview indicates the impact that transnational financial crimes can have, and also the problems that plague attempts to prevent such activities. National legislation is often influenced by broader, economic and political initiatives that seek to ensure a country’s position within the competitive global market (Brummer, 2015). This has hindered the development of an international legal framework on transnational financial crimes. In order to determine whether international or national laws have the biggest impact on the perpetration of transnational financial crimes, it is necessary to more profoundly examine a specific form of financial crime. Focus will therefore be directed towards fraud and corporate fraud.

We expect senior management to take clear responsibility for managing financial crime risks, which should be treated in the same manner as other risks faced by the business. There should be evidence that senior management are actively engaged in the firm’s approach to addressing the risks.

Self-assessment questions:

• When did senior management, including the board or appropriate sub-committees, last consider financial crime issues? What action followed discussions?
• How are senior management kept up to date on financial crime issues? (This may include receiving reports on the firm’s performance in this area as well as ad hoc briefings on individual cases or emerging threats.)
• Is there evidence that issues have been escalated where warranted?

Examples of good senior management practice

• Senior management set the right tone and demonstrate leadership on financial crime issues.
• A firm takes active steps to prevent criminals taking advantage of its services.
• A firm has a strategy for self-improvement on financial crime.
• There are clear criteria for escalating financial crime issues.

Examples of poor practice

• There is little evidence of senior staff involvement and challenge in practice.
• A firm concentrates on narrow compliance with minimum regulatory standards and has little engagement with the issues.
• Financial crime issues are dealt with on a purely reactive basis.
• There is no meaningful record or evidence of senior management considering financial crime risks.

[/vc_column_text]

An Investigative Study into Causal Factors of the Perpetration of Transnational Financial  & Economic Crime (s)

Fraud and corruption are always evolving. Changes in methods, technology and other factors make it critically important those trying to prevent and detect it to evolve, as well. Part of that process is to analyse fraud, corruption, bribery, money laundering and other crimes through the lense of research and casework. When experts share their findings and their knowledge into the numerous laws and regulations that address fraud, everyone benefits – especially vulnerable businesses and other organisations. CRI Group has recently published three new whitepapers that provide insightful looks into issues at the forefront of fraud and corruption today. They range from deep dives into the U.S., U.K. and other anti-fraud and anti-corruption laws around the world, to close examinations of actual fraud cases that hold lessons for all of us. We invite you to download these whitepapers and increase your knowledge of fraud, corruption, proper compliance, risk assessments, due diligence and more.

As transnational financial crimes have increased over the past few years, attentions have turned to the need to more fully understand the motivations that lead to the perpetration of such crimes. US and UK law will be critically compared in order to determine the extent to which they can be deemed effective in preventing financial crimes. This comparative study will focus on corporate fraud in a bid to support the ultimate conclusion set forth; that weaknesses in national laws are a core causal factor in the perpetration of transnational financial crimes. This reveals the need to strengthen such laws in order to deter and prevent such criminal activity.

This whitepaper provides an in-depth study of transnational financial crimes and the national laws and regulations that govern them. Laws in the U.S. and the U.K, in particular, are compared and examined in terms of effectiveness in preventing financial crimes. The comparative study focuses on corporate fraud. “The Catalysts for Economic Crime” pursues the question as to how weaknesses in national laws can be considered “a core causal factor in the perpetration of transnational financial crimes.” Readers will learn about the need to strengthen such laws or risk continued and increased criminal activity. Different types of financial crimes are examined, including money laundering, due to its prominence as a form of transnational financial crime. The research provides a detailed discussion of the inadequacies in current national laws, and proposes solutions through increased accountability, compliance-focused on self-governance and heightened monitoring for violations, among other important considerations.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”2/3″][vc_single_image][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_btn][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][accordion_father][accordion_son title=”About CRI Group” clr=”#ffffff” bgclr=”#1e73be”]Based in London, CRI Group works with companies across the Americas, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Asia-Pacific as a one-stop international Risk Management, Employee Background Screening,

In 2016, CRI Group launched Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. As a result, CRI Group’s global team of certified fraud examiners work as a discreet white-labelled supplier to some of the world’s largest organisations. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training.[/accordion_son][/accordion_father][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Resources by admin
No Comments »

Top 10 Bribery and Corruption Cases of 2019

There is a never-ending stream of news stories documenting bribery and corruption cases around the world. Some of those cases rose to the top of the headlines in 2019. All of the stories help illustrate the need for organisations to have proper controls in place to prevent further bribery and corruption cases popping up. A certification such as ISO 37001 – Anti-Bribery Management Systems standard can provide a comprehensive approach to mitigating bribery and corruption risk. Organisations of all sizes and industries should take steps now to ensure that they don’t end up on a future list of top bribery and corruption cases and scandals.

Here, we count down the stories we’ve chosen as the 10 most eye-popping bribery and corruption cases reported in 2019.

#10 – Juniper Networks

California-based cybersecurity firm Juniper Networks was ordered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to pay more than $11.7 for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The SEC alleges that some of the sales employees in Juniper’s Russian subsidiary “secretly agreed with third-party distributors to fund leisure trips for customers, including government officials through the use of off-book accounts.” In the settlement, Juniper did not explicitly admit nor deny the SEC’s claims – but it did agree to “cease and desist from committing or causing any violations”. (Reuters, 2019, SEC, 2019)

#9 – Alstom

Paris-based Alstom came under the attention of the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO), resulting in a £16.4 million judgment in fines and costs for a corruption scheme. Alstom Network UK Ltd was ordered to make the payment after an SFO investigation revealed a fraudulent contract with an intermediary that was “simply a conduit for bribes”. To hide the corruption, Alstom went so far as to provide fake paperwork and fraudulent compliance checks. Three former Alstom employees were jailed in the case.

The multinational conglomerate, which serves the rail industry in locations worldwide (and formerly included interests in the power industry), has seen trouble at several units in various regions. In 2014, Alstom SA pleaded guilty in the U.S. to violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The company bribed officials in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Indonesia and the Bahamas, resulting in $772 million in criminal penalties. In 2016, Alstom Power Ltd pleaded guilty in the UK for corruption involving a Lithuanian power project. (WSJ 2019, FCPA Blog, 2019)

#8 – Microsoft

In Hungary, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microsoft (aptly named Microsoft Hungry) was busted for a bid-rigging and bribery scheme, costing the corporation $25.3 million in combined criminal and civil penalties. The action was brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC for violations spanning from 2013 until “at least” 2015.

The scandal centered around the sale of Microsoft software licenses to Hungarian government agencies. Microsoft Hungary employees, including executives, were found to have falsely represented steep “discounts” in order to conclude deals with resellers, in violation of the FCPA. The SEC further found Microsoft’s subsidiary in Turkey “provided an excessive discount to an unauthorized third party in a licensing transaction for which Microsoft’s records do not reflect any services provided”.(Compliance Week, 2019)

#7 – KPMG

Big Four accounting firm KPMG found itself in all sorts of embarrassing (and costly) trouble over allegations that some of its former employees used stolen information to alter previous audit work – and cheated on training exams. The firm admitted to the allegations and agreed to pay the SEC $50 million to settle the charges. The case is significant as it marks the largest fine imposed on an auditor by the SEC to date.

“The breadth and seriousness of the misconduct at issue here is, frankly, astonishing”, said Steven Peikin, one of the SEC’s enforcement directors. “This settlement reflects the need to severely punish this sort of wrongdoing while putting in place measures designed to prevent its recurrence”. (Reuters, 2019)

#6 – Samsung Heavy Industries

A subsidiary of Samsung Group, South Korea-based Samsung Heavy Industries Company Ltd. (“SHI”) found itself under investigation for involvement in the Petrobras scandal. Specifically, the company was charged in a scheme to pay millions of dollars in bribes to Petrobras official in return for Petrobras chartering one of SHI’s oil drillships. Petrobras is the Brasilian state-owned energy company caught up in a major, ongoing investigation over widespread corruption.

According to the DOJ, SHI conspired to pay commissions, including some of that money for bribes, to Brasilian intermediaries beginning 2007 and continuing until 2013. The amount topped $20 million. SHI admitted to the charges and entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ. As per the agreement, SHI will pay 50 percent of the total penalties to the U.S. and the remaining 50 percent to the Brasilian authorities. (Lexology, 2019)

#5 – Fresenius Medical

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (based in Bad Homburg, Germany) agreed to pay $231 in penalties for bribing doctors and public health officials in at least 17 countries. Fresenius is the world’s largest provider of dialysis equipment and services. It will make the payments to the DOJ and SEC to settle violations of the FCPA in various countries and continents, including Africa, the Middle East and Europe.

According to the SEC, in some locations, Fresenius failed to train employees or conduct due diligence on agents, and “in many instances, senior management actively engaged in corruption schemes and directed employees to destroy records of the misconduct”. Fresenius paid about $30 million in bribes “using sham consulting contracts, falsifying documents, and funneling bribes through a system of third party intermediaries”. (FCPA Blog, 2019)

#4 – Walmart

Retail giant Walmart is alleged to have engaged in corrupt payments to governments and officials around the world for more than 10 years, according to an agreement reached with the DOJ and SEC. Walmart will pay $282 million to settle the charges that it violated the FCPA in an effort to open new locations in various countries and jurisdictions around the world. Notably, Walmart’s Brasilian subsidy pleaded guilty to breaking U.S. federal law – but allegations included cases in Mexico, China, India and other locations.

Federal regulators said Walmart looked the other way as subsidiaries on three continents paid millions of dollars to middlemen who helped the company obtain permits and other government approvals from July 2000 to April 2011. (The New York Times, 2019)

#3 – TechnipFMC

London-based TechnipFMC was charged with making illicit payments to advance the company’s interests in Iraq and Brasil. The company paid a $296 million settlement to the DOJ for the two bribery schemes. In Tuesday’s enforcement action, the DOJ said the charges against TechnipFMC “arose out of two independent bribery schemes: a scheme by Technip to pay bribes to Brazilian officials and a scheme by FMC to pay bribes to officials in Iraq”.

The SEC alleged that from 2003 until at least 2013, Technip conspired with Singapore-based Keppel Offshore to pay $69 million in bribes, disguised as “commission payments” passed in part to Petrobras – as well as more than $6 million in payments to the Workers’ Party in Brazil and to Workers’ Party officials. In Iraq beginning in 2008 and continuing until at least 2013, FMC bribed at least seven government officials “through a Monaco-based intermediary company”, the DOJ said. (DOJ, 2019)

#2 – Ericsson

Number two on our list is Swedish telecom giant Ericsson. The company paid a blockbuster sum of more than $1 billion (U.S.) to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for “violating the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the FCPA.”

According to the DOJ, the corruption scandal spanned 17 years and at least five countries. It involved high-level executives and was geared toward increasing Ericsson’s profits. Ericcson allegedly used slush funds to bribe officials in various countries including China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Kuwait.

In China, for example, Ericsson subsidiaries paid millions in bribes that were ultimately delivered to officials, including about $31.5 million for services that were never performed. (DOJ, 2019)

#1 – Unaoil

And finally, number one on our list: The massive Unaoil scandal continued to make headlines. Four businessmen pleaded guilty in London courts in 2019, admitting that they were involved in paying millions in bribes. According to investigators, the illicit payments were made to officials in nine different countries over a span of 17 years. As part of the scheme, participants were alleged to have engaged in widespread money laundering and attempts to destroy evidence.

It is alleged that two of the key players in the scandal made millions of dollars in bribe payments to government officials in Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Libya and Syria. Fallout continues from the massive Unaoil case, which some have said is the largest bribery scandal in history. The family business from Monaco is alleged to have systematically corrupted the global oil industry, paying our millions of dollars in bribes for big-name companies including Samsung, Rolls-Royce and Halliburton. (The Guardian, 2019, The Age)

Let us know if you would like to learn more about other bribery and corruption cases or our solutions!

If you have any questions or interest in implementing compliance solutions, please contact us.

CRI Group has safeguarded businesses from any risks, providing investigations (i.e. insurance fraud), employee background screening, investigative due diligence, business intelligence,  third-party risk management, forensic accounting, compliance and other professional investigative research services. In 2016, CRI Group launched Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption (ABAC®) Center of Excellence – an independent certification body established for ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems, ISO 37301 Compliance Management Systems and ISO 31000:2018 Risk Management, providing training and certification. ABAC® operates through its global network of certified ethics and compliance professionals, qualified auditors and other certified professionals. Contact ABAC® for more on ISO Certification and training

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, Compliance Solution, ISO 37001, Resources by admin
No Comments »

We’re All Paying a High Price for Corporate Corruption

Corruption weakens governments, fuels organised crime, stifles economic growth and discourages development. International corruption continues to undermine the progress of developing nations as rogue politicians, civic leaders and corporate representatives conduct “business as usual” to bypass bureaucratic red tape or circumvent competitive processes. But the world is taking notice and punishing those organisations accused of corruption practices. From damaged corporate reputations that lead to brand and stock devaluation to negative investor perceptions, legal action and even jail terms for corporate directors, the high cost of corruption can have a lasting effect on even the most diligent organisations.

Companies worldwide can fall victim at any time to bribery and corruption practices, particularly those organisations with multi-national operations utilising vast networks of third-party agents, suppliers, distributors and consultants. Navigating the complex web of multi-jurisdiction laws and regulations around the world related to anti-bribery and anti-corruption practices can be daunting, exhausting financial resources and taxing personnel. But now there’s an all-encompassing solution for building strong global compliance frameworks and safeguarding your organisation from third-party risks.

Global efforts to fight bribery and corruption 

The past decade has seen a dramatic rise in the prosecution of organisations accused in bribery schemes. Often regarded in many regions as a standard operating procedure necessary to move business along, the practise of bribery is fast becoming a focal point for governments and global watchdogs’ intent on levying heavy fines and penalties for companies involved in the practice. In this situation which with the course of time, regional and international regulations are becoming stricter, particularly companies that are in the supply chain (importers, exporters, third-party service providers or indenters) for any foreign company.

Foreign companies are now being penalised if discovered that companies in their supply chain are involved in corrupt practices. These companies are increasingly complying with international laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), Malaysian Anti-Corruption. Commission (Amendment) Act 2018 introduced a new far-reaching corporate liability provision, the UK Bribery Act, Brazilian Clean Company Act. This progress intends to eliminate corruption from supply chains and third-party working relationships of foreign companies. Companies that are not complying with these laws are being panelised and prosecuted heavily.

ABAC® Center of Excellence Limited “ABAC Certification”

Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Center of Excellence Limited “ABAC Certification” was created to educate, equip and support the world’s leading business organisations with the latest in best-practice due diligence processes and procedures. We provide world-class services to organisations seeking to validate or expand their existing compliance frameworks to maintain a competitive edge in the world marketplace. The ABAC® Center of Excellence offers a complete suite of world-class services and solutions designed to help organisations mitigate the internal and external risks associated with operating in multi-jurisdiction and multi-cultural environments.

Bribery and Corruption Risk Management

ABAC Certification provides an expert audit of your existing risk management system to assess effectiveness and vulnerabilities while ensuring your organisation adequately complies with FCPA regulations, UK Bribery Act laws, Anti-Money Laundering regulations, and other global, regional and local regulations.

ISO 37001:2016 Certification

CRI Group offers independent global accredited ISO 37001:2016 certification to ensure that your organisation complies with this newly established standard, which is recognised and practised in more than 160 countries worldwide. Our auditors and analysts work with your team to develop policies, communications, training, monitoring and reporting measures that integrate seamlessly with your existing management processes and controls.

ABAC Certification & Strategies

ABAC® Certification’s exclusive Third-Party Risk Management-3PRM-Certified™ solution provides the very best in third-party bribery and corruption risk management, corporate compliance program, providing a proactive approach to mitigating risks from third-party affiliations and protecting your organisation from liability, brand damage and harm to the business. ABAC® presents innovative and globally accepted risk management solutions with an accredited corporate compliance program that can be applied to any organisation.

Becoming Compliant: The Benefits of ISO 37001 Certification

Because ISO 37001 is built around a set of generally accepted requirements, global organisations can become certified in the standard, utilising the services of an accredited third-party certifying body. Certification will add a distinct level of credibility to the organisation’s management systems and must be completed by a qualified, independent third-party specifically versed in ISO 37001:2016 certification. Becoming certified in ISO 37001 enables the organisation to demonstrate that it has adequate procedures in place to detect and prevent bribery on a multi-national level. Additionally, such certification:

• Ensures that the organisation is implementing a viable anti-bribery management program utilising widely accepted controls and systems.
• You are minimising corruption and bribery lawsuit likelihood.
• Lessening the possible litigation penalty through demonstrating an effective and adequate compliance program
• Assures management, investors, business associates, personnel and other stakeholders that the organisation is actively pursuing internationally recognised and accepted processes to prevent bribery and corruption.
• Protects the organisation, its assets, shareholders and directors from the effects of bribery.
• Provides acceptable evidence to prosecutors or courts that the organisation has taken reasonable steps to prevent bribery and corruption.

Bribery continues to be a significant problem on a worldwide scale and conforming to an internationally recognised standard to combat the practice while promoting ethics in business will help organisations succeed in the ever-expanding global marketplace. Contact us today to learn more about safeguarding your organisation from the outside risks associated with multi-national business affiliations.

Filed under: Anti-Bribery Anti-Corruption Solution, ISO 37001, Resources by admin
No Comments »